Veylan
All workflows
Workflow starting point

Investigate a production quality exception

Connect a failed inspection to production records and approved procedures so quality teams can investigate and assign corrective work.

Explore the workflowDiscuss your workflow
Veylan quality investigation conversation with an evidence comparison and quality-owner review.
Starts with
An inspection fails or a production order records rework or scrap.
Who decides
The quality engineer confirms cause, containment, disposition and closure. The agent does not release a lot or alter machine settings.
Output
Quality investigation packet; Missing-evidence checklist; Corrective-action proposal
Inputs
  • QMS/MES inspection records — The failed inspection, measured result, test identifier and recorded rework or scrap, linked to the production record.
  • ERP order and lot identifiers — Order and lot identifiers that connect the affected production to its inspection history and related records.
  • Controlled specifications — The approved specification revision and acceptance limits that applied when the check was performed.
  • Approved corrective-action history — Relevant prior investigations, approved troubleshooting procedures and recorded verification results used as supporting evidence.
Step by step

A traceable investigation of the failed check

Connect a failed inspection to production records and approved procedures so quality teams can investigate and assign corrective work.

Configure and validate this starting point around your sources, permissions, and review responsibilities before implementation.

  1. 01
    Agent preparation

    Identify the failed check

    Link the failed check to its order, lot, specification revision and measured result.

  2. 02
    Agent preparation

    Gather the production evidence

    Gather related inspection history and approved troubleshooting procedures.

  3. 03
    Agent preparation

    Separate facts from causes

    Separate confirmed facts from possible causes and identify missing evidence.

  4. 04
    Human decision

    Review corrective actions

    The quality engineer reviews the evidence, approves containment and corrective tasks, and defines the verification needed before closure.

The quality engineer confirms cause, containment, disposition and closure. The agent does not release a lot or alter machine settings.

Veylan production quality investigation comparing inspection results with the approved specification, separating facts from hypotheses, and preparing an editable verification task.
Outputs

What the team receives

Quality investigation packet
The failed check, applicable specification and related production evidence, with confirmed facts separated from possible causes.
Missing-evidence checklist
Unverified conditions, absent records and questions the quality team must resolve before confirming the cause.
Corrective-action proposal
Options for containment or corrective tasks, proposed owners and verification checks for the quality engineer’s approval. Lot release remains a human decision.

Scope this workflow around your operation.

Plants that retain inspection results, traceable production records and an accountable quality function.

Discuss your workflow